Description of problem: Bug.get XMLRPC call did not return a bug result or any failure even though the bug is in Bugzilla database (as verified in Web UI): $ python Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 27 2011, 01:40:22) [GCC 4.6.1 20111003 (Red Hat 4.6.1-10)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. ... >>> proxy <ServerProxy for partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/xmlrpc.cgi> >>> proxy.Bug.get({'ids' : [688765]}) {'faults': [], 'bugs': [{}]} Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.2.1-0.b27 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run Bug.get XMLRPC call 2. 3. Actual results: No Bug is returned Expected results: A Bug with given ID is returned Additional info:
I just realized that the call returns the result if I specify the fields that should be returned: >>> proxy.Bug.get({'ids' : [688765], 'include_fields': [ 'id', 'summary', 'status', 'description']}) {'faults': [], 'bugs': [{'status': 'MODIFIED', 'description': 'Description of problem:\nAfter creating a asfdb record with ipa dnsrecord-add, the record does not seem to be resolvable by dig. \n\nVersion-Release number of selected component (if applicable):\nipa-server-2.0.0-14.el6.x86_64\n\nHow reproducible:\nalways\n\nSteps to Reproduce:\n1. ipa dnsrecord-add newzone afsdb --afsdb-rec "interesting.zone.com."\n2. dig AFSDB afsdb.newzonezone \n\n \nActual results:\n;; QUESTION SECTION:\n;afsdb.newzone.\t\t\tIN\tAFSDB', 'id': 688765, 'summary': '[RFE] afsdb records to not seem to be resolvable.'}]} Is this intentional? I would expect that at least some basic attributes would be returned with default "include_fields". Lowering the severity...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 816038 ***
(In reply to comment #1) > Is this intentional? I would expect that at least some basic attributes would > be returned with default "include_fields". Definitely not intentional. I made a change on Tuesday that accidentally caused this. It will be fixed in the next release.