Bug 816807 - Off-by-one error in FullFastIterator.next() leads to botched queries
Summary: Off-by-one error in FullFastIterator.next() leads to botched queries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: BRE (Expert, Fusion)
Version: BRMS 5.3.0.GA
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ER7
: BRMS 5.3.0.GA
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-27 04:39 UTC by Mark Proctor
Modified: 2025-02-10 03:19 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-10 03:19:43 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBRULES-3483 0 None Closed Off-by-one error in FullFastIterator.next() leads to botched queries 2012-05-28 01:29:55 UTC

Description Mark Proctor 2012-04-27 04:39:17 UTC
The rete node memory iterators will skip entries in the last bucket after it has found the first entry, due to a check against the current row.

This is a critical fix as it results in loss of integirty and corruption of running applications.

Comment 2 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-04-27 05:02:57 UTC
Mark Proctor <mproctor> updated the status of jira JBRULES-3483 to Resolved

Comment 3 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-04-27 05:03:08 UTC
Mark Proctor <mproctor> updated the status of jira JBRULES-3483 to Closed

Comment 4 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-04-27 05:05:48 UTC
Adar Dembo <adar> made a comment on jira JBRULES-3483

What about a backport for 5.3.x? That's the latest stable release, right?

Comment 5 Mark Proctor 2012-05-04 16:45:48 UTC
yes I've said this must be backported to 5.3. I'm awaiting permission to do so.

Comment 6 Edson Tirelli 2012-05-04 16:59:35 UTC
Cherry-picked into 5.3.x branch as requested by Mark.

https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/20f2682afb65381ad2a32ec8431448e2bd974fd8

Comment 7 Ryan Zhang 2012-05-14 08:16:14 UTC
The fixed for this issue should be included in ER7. Please do verification on it.

Comment 9 Lukáš Petrovický 2012-05-22 08:39:14 UTC
The fix is in ER7 and the test doesn't fail. VERIFIED.

Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-02-10 03:19:43 UTC
This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.