Bug 817022 - Review Request: perl-Test-Apocalypse - Apocalypse's favorite tests bundled into a simple interface
Review Request: perl-Test-Apocalypse - Apocalypse's favorite tests bundled in...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jitka Plesnikova
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 816488 816501 816538 816547 816571 816656 816990
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2012-04-27 09:07 EDT by Petr Pisar
Modified: 2012-07-03 08:37 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.002-1.fc18
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-07-03 08:37:29 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
jplesnik: fedora‑review+
limburgher: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Petr Pisar 2012-04-27 09:07:24 EDT
Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Apocalypse/perl-Test-Apocalypse.spec
SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Apocalypse/perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.001-1.fc18.src.rpm
This module greatly simplifies common author tests for modules heading towards
CPAN. I was sick of copy/pasting the tons of t/foo.t scripts + managing them
in every distribution. I thought it would be nice to bundle all of it into one
module and toss it on CPAN :) That way, every time I update this module all of
my distributions would be magically updated!
Comment 1 Jitka Plesnikova 2012-07-02 06:00:07 EDT
There is newer version 1.002 on cpan.org. 

test t/apocalypse.t failed due to missing build require Test::NoWarnings.

Can't locate Test/NoWarnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Apocalypse-1.001/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Apocalypse-1.001/blib/arch /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at t/apocalypse.t line 19.
t/apocalypse.t .. 

Comment 3 Jitka Plesnikova 2012-07-03 02:43:35 EDT
Package Review

- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated

==== Generic ====
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git
External plugins:

Comment 4 Petr Pisar 2012-07-03 02:50:06 EDT
New Package SCM Request
Package Name: perl-Test-Apocalypse
Short Description: Apocalypse's favorite tests bundled into a simple interface
Owners: ppisar jplesnik mmaslano pssabata
InitialCC: perl-sig
Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-07-03 07:55:28 EDT
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Corrected pssabata->psabata.
Comment 6 Petr Pisar 2012-07-03 08:37:29 EDT
Thank you for the review and the repository.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.