RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Hi.

lsb_release is a generally useful tool, e.g. to easily and "portably" find out the running distribution and its version.

However, redhat-lsb depends on a huge pile of desktop crap (qt, cups, etc. pp.).

Please follow what e.g. Debian already does and split out lsb_release in a smallish base (lsb-relase) package with no further dependencies.


Cheers,
Chris.

Could this be resolved by providing a separate redhat-lsb-core?
See also bug 835919.

I guess so.

What one needs is a package that has no further dependecies (especially not on any large stuff like Qt), which provides some core utilities of lsb.

As mentioned, have a look at what Debian provides in lsb-base and lsb-release.


Actually it's not only the lsb_release command that would be useful in a small standard package, but also e.g. /lib/lsb/init-functions
Uses also by many EPEL packages even though they don't depend correctly on the current big monolithic lsb package.

(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually it's not only the lsb_release command that would be useful in a
> small standard package, but also e.g. /lib/lsb/init-functions
> Uses also by many EPEL packages even though they don't depend correctly on
> the current big monolithic lsb package.

Yes, I believe the new redhat-lsb-core package should include all
commands/functions currently present in redhat-lsb, just omit the
dependencies which will remain in redhat-lsb. Thanks for the info.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 835919 ***