Hide Forgot
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2677 This issue was found during development for #2676. When paging for Password policy is enabled (and UI thus at first asks server for all password policy records with `--pkey-only` option and then runs batch query to retrieve password policy data on the page), their order is not consistent with the one provided by server. Password policies should be ordered by COS Priority, not name.
This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Fixed upstream * master: edbcd28f44fb5c123440c246965166d5947554e6 * ipa-3-0: 55efbdd2c381ffc7446d3083b987b9026658b96c
verified in ipa-server-3.0.0-22.el6.x86_64 https://wiki.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com/qa/archive/ipa/webui/automation/firefox/test-output-ipa-server-3.0.0-QA/0114_64bit/full%20suite/IPAPasswordPolicyTestSuite/index.html testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407 Bug 817407 -Passwd Policy Should Be Ordered By COS Priority Not Name Parameters: bug817407 Hide output Show all outputs Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Starting Test: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Asserted: policy [highest] does not exist before add Asserted: new policy [highest] has been added Asserted: policy [second] does not exist before add Asserted: new policy [second] has been added Asserted: policy [third] does not exist before add Asserted: new policy [third] has been added Asserted: policy [fourth] does not exist before add Asserted: new policy [fourth] has been added Asserted: Passwd Policies Are Ordered By COS Priority Asserted: Passwd Policies Are Ordered By COS Priority Asserted: Passwd Policies Are Ordered By COS Priority Asserted: policy [highest] does not exist after test Asserted: policy [second] does not exist after test Asserted: policy [third] does not exist after test Asserted: policy [fourth] does not exist after test delete user group [highest] delete user group [second] delete user group [third] delete user group [fourth] Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407]) Test Passed: testPriorityNotOrdered_Bug817407([bug817407])
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0528.html