Created attachment 581555 [details] err Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. This is with reference to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818122 2. Built an image , created application blueprint 3. Deleted image , Catalog -- Application BP and edit xml shows this header message : "Missing template deployables/show with {:handlers=>[:builder, :rjs, :haml, :rhtml, :erb, :rxml], :locale=>[:en, :en], :formats=>[:json, :js, "*/*"]} in view paths "/usr/share/aeolus-conductor/app/views" " Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: rpm -qa|grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-0.8.13-1.el6_2.noarch aeolus-configure-2.5.3-1.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.1-1.el6.noarch aeolus-all-0.8.13-1.el6_2.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.13-1.el6_2.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.13-1.el6_2.noarch
Created attachment 581610 [details] ss hrm.. that is odd.. If the image id is not valid, the view xml button for an application blueprint should turn black, and be marked invalid. When I walk through the recreate: 1. create image 2. create app blueprint 3. delete image 4. revisit app blueprint I get the message in the screenshot. Is there something else in the recreate that I am not hitting? Are you using multiple browswers?
Steps to recreate : 1) Create Image 2) Create App BP 3) delete Image 4) revisit app BP .. leave the page for 2 mins .. after two mins or so click on Edit Xml . You will see the error This is reproduced with single browser FF
This appears to be fixed, moving to Modified
good 2 go with: aeolus-conductor-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1516.html