Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 818282

Summary: [RFE] Alter List Order of Contract Selector
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Matt Reid <mreid>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs <entitlement-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.9CC: bgollahe, bkearney, dgoodwin, fsharath, jmolet
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-08 03:52:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 771748, 827225    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Sorted entitlements on virt none

Description Matt Reid 2012-05-02 15:53:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
When we present the contract selector to users, it doesn't look like we tailor it to their system. When it shows on a VM, I get a Physical type offered to me as the first option, instead of a Virtual one. It would be nice if the first one offered was a Virtual type if they're running a VM, as they probably have more virtual entitlements than physical ones (possibly unlimited).
Comment 1 Devan Goodwin 2012-05-31 17:12:42 UTC 
Fixed in subscription-manager master: bf7ee031eacbd0a1cac2ff40df94caad04a3cd1b and 8848d0be347548d3b1b4904223d8add09e75b1ba.

Will appear in: subscription-manager-1.0.3-1

Virtual subs are sorted to the top. We can't really get much more fancy than this in terms of determining applicability.
Comment 2 Sharath Dwaral 2012-06-21 13:42:03 UTC 
Created attachment 593449 [details]
Sorted entitlements on virt

Version

RHEL 5.9

# rpm -qa | egrep "subscription-manager|python-rhsm"
subscription-manager-migration-1.0.4-1.git.1.b28337e.el5
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.11.1.1-1.git.2.c7fbafe.el5
python-rhsm-1.0.2-1.git.2.d5c3d05.el5
subscription-manager-firstboot-1.0.4-1.git.1.b28337e.el5
subscription-manager-1.0.4-1.git.1.b28337e.el5
subscription-manager-gui-1.0.4-1.git.1.b28337e.el5

# subscription-manager facts | grep virt
virt.host_type: kvm
virt.is_guest: True
virt.uuid: 6b040675-645a-f322-8f68-9d9b4757d565

Virtual entitlements are sorted on top on virtual systems by default

Marking verified
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-08 03:52:06 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0033.html