Description of problem: Due to a known issue in the RHEL subscription-manager package, CloudForms is providing a newer version of the subscription-manager package (subscription-manager-0.96.17.2-3.el6_2). This package is made available in the cf-tools repos ... > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.1/i386/cf-tools/1.0/os > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.1/x86_64/cf-tools/1.0/os > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.2/i386/cf-tools/1.0/os > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.2/x86_64/cf-tools/1.0/os > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6Server/i386/cf-tools/1.0/os > http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6Server/x86_64/cf-tools/1.0/os Unfortunately, the subscription-manager package fails to install on RHEL6.1 due to an unmet rpm dependency. I'm unclear why this problem has surfaced now. Perhaps this is due to the recent CDN refresh on stage. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install and configure katello 2. Import a valid manifest and sync content from cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com 3. Create a system template with the following repos included: * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server RPMs x86_64 6.1 - http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.1/x86_64/os * Red Hat CloudForms Tools for RHEL 6 RPMs x86_64 6.1 - http://cdn.rcm-qa.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel/server/6/6.1/x86_64/cf-tools/1.0/os 4. Add the 'subscription-manager' package to the system template 5. On a CloudEngine system, attempt to build the system template from steps #3-4 Actual results: Image build fails due to the following dependency: > SubprocessException: 'ssh -i /etc/oz/id_rsa-icicle-gen -F /dev/null -o ServerAliveInterval=30 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o ConnectTimeout=10 -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o PasswordAuthentication=no root.122.190 yum -y install "subscription-manager" "katello-agent" "aeolus-audrey-agent" "rhev-agent" ' failed(1): Warning: Permanently added '192.168.122.190' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > Error: Package: subscription-manager-0.96.17.2-3.el6_2.x86_64 (Red_Hat_CloudForms_Tools_for_RHEL_6_RPMs_x86_64_6.1) > Requires: python-rhsm >= 0.96.11 > Installed: python-rhsm-0.95.14-1.el6_1.noarch (@anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105101844.x86_64/6.1) > python-rhsm = 0.95.14-1.el6_1 > Available: python-rhsm-0.95.6-1.el6.noarch (Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_Server_RPMs_x86_64_6.1) > python-rhsm = 0.95.6-1.el6 Image build also fails when trying to build an i386 image: > root.122.244 yum -y install "subscription-manager" "katello-agent" "aeolus-audrey-agent" "rhev-agent" ' failed(1): Warning: Permanently added '192.168.122.244' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > Error: Package: subscription-manager-0.96.17.2-3.el6_2.i686 (Red_Hat_CloudForms_Tools_for_RHEL_6_RPMs_i386_6.1) > Requires: python-rhsm >= 0.96.11 > Installed: python-rhsm-0.95.14-1.el6_1.noarch (@anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105101829.i386/6.1) > python-rhsm = 0.95.14-1.el6_1 > Available: python-rhsm-0.95.6-1.el6.noarch (Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_Server_RPMs_i386_6.1) > python-rhsm = 0.95.6-1.el6 Expected results: * Either ... 1) Don't ship a newer subscription-manager for 6.1 cf-tools/ 2) Don't provide cf-tools/ for 6.1 at all 3) Include the python-rhsm from 6.2 in the 6.1 cf-tools repo 4) <something better> Additional info:
Setting the priority to urgent as I believe the presence of this failure impacts our support statement for building RHEL-6.1 images.
Re-assigning to release-engineering.
my vote is for option 1) because rhsm qe currently does not validate placing newer subscription manager packages on older operating systems...
Not shipping newer subscription manager in cf-tools for 6.1, end of story.
(In reply to comment #4) > Not shipping newer subscription manager in cf-tools for 6.1, end of story. Hey, they pay me to be Mr. Pedantic ... To clarify, we already were shipping a newer subscription-manager for 6.1. However, we weren't also shipping a newer python-rhsm that it required. In any case, no objections here :)
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist