Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be available on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 818658 - Package doesn't comply with Emacs packaging guidelines (patch attached)
Summary: Package doesn't comply with Emacs packaging guidelines (patch attached)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cmake
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orion Poplawski
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-05-03 16:33 UTC by Jonathan Underwood
Modified: 2012-05-03 20:17 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 2.8.8-2.fc18
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-03 20:17:24 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to fix spec file for emacs packaging compliance. (1.73 KB, patch)
2012-05-03 16:33 UTC, Jonathan Underwood
no flags Details | Diff

Description Jonathan Underwood 2012-05-03 16:33:45 UTC
Created attachment 581900 [details]
Patch to fix spec file for emacs packaging compliance.

Description of problem:
Currently the cmake package doesn't comply with the packaging guidelines for package containing emacs related files - see:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs

I've attached a spec file patch which attempts to address this, but I am presently sitting at a RHEL6 box, and mock can't build rawhide packages on RHEL6 presently, so I haven't actually tested the patch, but it should give you the idea. This should work for Fedora 16 and onwards. For Fedora 15 there were different guidelines in place, but since that release is near EOL, I haven't bothered addressing this issue for that release.

Comment 1 Jonathan Underwood 2012-05-03 16:34:58 UTC
Also I forgot to add a %changelog entry.

Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2012-05-03 20:17:24 UTC
Thanks for the patch.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.