Bug 82157 – request - addition of proftpd package

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours

Bug 82157 - request - addition of proftpd package

Summary:	request - addition of proftpd package

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Public Beta
Classification:	Retired
Component:	vsftpd (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	phoebe
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:	Mike McLean
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	FutureFeature

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-01-18 09:49 EST by ivan
Modified:	2014-03-16 22:33 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-01-20 15:47:27 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description ivan 2003-01-18 09:49:31 EST

Description of problem:

It would be very useful to have proftpd as a package - it allows "virtual FTP
servers", and has 
many functions that vsftpd does not have (due to differing target audiences). I
would like to have 
different directories for a user, depending on what FTP hostname they connected
to (amongst 
other things). This is for a commercial setup (FWIW).

Many thanks (and sorry for having to assign to "vsftpd" - it seemed to be the
closest appropriate 
package).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
    
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-01-20 15:47:27 EST

vsftpd actually can do virtual servers.

At this point we're cutting down on the number of servers we ship for the same
function; I think we'll most likely stick with just vsftpd.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.