Bug 821725
| Summary: | quota: brick process kill allows quota limit cross | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Saurabh <saujain> | |
| Component: | quota | Assignee: | vpshastry <vshastry> | |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | ||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | medium | |||
| Version: | pre-release | CC: | amarts, gluster-bugs, mzywusko, nsathyan, vbellur | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Known Issue | ||
| Doc Text: |
Cause: when quota limit is set on a distributed volume, and if a brick goes down while I/O is happening, there is a chance that the effective 'quota limit' can be exceeded as distribute translator would not see the contribution from the offline brick.
Consequence: 'quota limit' gets exceeded.
Workaround (if any): use 'replication' in case one needs 100% consistency when a node goes down.
Result: When replicate is used, it would take care of single brick failure, and quota limit will be maintained as is.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 848253 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-04 11:12:27 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 848253 | |||
|
Description
Saurabh
2012-05-15 12:45:49 UTC
Need to have an extra flag set on the directory when quota limit is reached on a directory. Extremely hard to keep the information about the lost brick for quota computation, in non-replicated setup. But we need an enhancement to handle quota limit set flag in xattr when its ~95% of limit value. That way, we will not be missing quota limit by a large margin. This issue should just be marked as Known-Issues, and be handled by setting the 'right expectation' in admin, than that of technical solution, which would make the performance crawl, and solution never satisfying for 100% userbase. If any one thinks this feature is a must to use gluster quota (after reading known issues section), please re-open the bug. |