Hide Forgot
Latest upstream release: 4.2.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/20/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.0.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.0.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.0.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.0.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.0.4 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
5.x was released one year ago, is there any plan for Fedora ? API changes/compatibility report for the giflib library: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/giflib.html
ping !!
Any patch suggestions for the *.spec file?
Created attachment 758222 [details] spec file patch
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #8) > Any patch suggestions for the *.spec file? ping!
This part of the spec file is buggy: # Handling of libungif compatibility MAJOR=`echo '%{version}' | sed -e 's/\([0-9]\+\)\..*/\1/'` %{__cc} $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -shared -Wl,-soname,libungif.so.$MAJOR -Llib/.libs -lgif -o libungif.so.%{version} SONAME VERSION in giflib-5.0 was changed to "6"
Does it really make sense to keep libungif compatibility?
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #12) > Does it really make sense to keep libungif compatibility? repoquery shows two dependencies: driftnet and WindowMaker(subpackage WINGs-devel) Other than that, I think there will be not any trouble.
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #12) > Does it really make sense to keep libungif compatibility? Probably not. At this point in time, any software that links against libungif should just be patched to link against giflib instead. The last known LZW patents that affect GIFs expired in 2006: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html#returnnote
Latest upstream release: 5.0.5 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6-9.fc20 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
any news on that ?
ping!
You do realize you broke whole Java stack by updating to 5.0.5 and breaking OpenJDK? A rehash of updates policy for rawhide[1] 1. Try not to push a clearly broken build (breaks the default buildroot package set, etc) 2. A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild when there are abi/api changes that require rebuilds in other packages or offer to do these rebuilds for them. 3. Use a separate buildsystem tag when dealing with mass builds of many packages, so they can land at the same time. File a ticket with https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/newticket for this. 4. Feel free to push out the newest version of packages as long as they do not cause breakage. Also keep in mind that the next Fedora release will be branched off rawhide a few months down the road. Therefore, it is best to only push development releases to rawhide if you are fairly confident that there will be a stable enough release in time for the next Fedora release. Otherwise you may have to back down to an older, stable version after the branching, which may involve epochs and other inconveniences. Read point 2 carefully. Week in advance. If this was announced anywhere it didn't reach OpenJDK maintainers. I understand that some upstreams slip soname changes in micro updates so they can go by unnoticed but this was a known major release. Please be more careful next time [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master
Uhm? I did a repoquery before, but apparently my used command was wrong: $ repoquery --repofrompath=rawhide,http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/linux/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os -q -a --whatrequires giflib-devel giflib-devel-0:4.1.6-9.fc20.x86_64 giflib-devel-0:4.1.6-9.fc20.i686 WINGs-devel-0:0.95.5-1.fc21.i686 WINGs-devel-0:0.95.5-1.fc21.x86_64 WINGs-devel-0:0.95.5-2.el6.i686 WINGs-devel-0:0.95.5-2.el6.x86_64 imlib-devel-1:1.9.15-14.el6.i686 imlib-devel-1:1.9.15-14.el6.x86_64 imlib-devel-1:1.9.15-24.fc20.i686 imlib-devel-1:1.9.15-24.fc20.x86_64 $ When I now cross-checked the "Component of Buildroot" there are indeed more packages...sorry!
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #19) > Uhm? I did a repoquery before, but apparently my used command was wrong: You can use this query: for p in $(repoquery --repoid rawhide -a --qf '%{base_package_name} %{name}' | awk '/^giflib /{print$2}' | sort -u); do repoquery --repoid rawhide -s --whatrequires $p && repoquery --repoid rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires $p; done | sed 's|-[^-]*-[^-]*$||' | sort -u | egrep -v "^giflib$"
Oh...that's a more complicated command. Thank you! And yes, now I get that you are a bit upset about the giflib bump. driftnet ekg2 emacs evas fbida fontforge gdal gnash gnustep-gui imlib imlib2 java-1.7.0-openjdk java-1.8.0-openjdk kdelibs kmess kopete leptonica libextractor libgdiplus libwebp MagicPoint mapserver mathgl mplayer mtpaint ocaml-camlimages OpenSceneGraph perl-Imager perl-Prima pslib python-gd spamassassin-FuzzyOcr sxiv tracker WindowMaker xemacs xplanet xteddy Okay...I broke it, thus I'll also try to fix it: Does it still make sense to use a buildsystem tag now that the new giflib has landed in Rawhide? Or is it better to fire simply rebuilds of the affected packages? Suggestions?
Any chance of having this for f21 ?
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Hello Xose. According to the following compatibility report the difference between 4.1.x and 5.0.x is so huge, that it isn't easily possible to update to giflib 5 unless all the dependent software projects included in fedora introduce support for the new giflib interface. http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/giflib/4.2.3_to_5.0.0/abi_compat_report.html 99% incompatibility means it's completely rewritten and even more incompatible than openjpeg 1.5 and 2.0 where I rejected the update request too. We have to wait few years to give the upstream maintainers enough time to do the transition without our intervention -OR- find somebody who can write and submit patches upstream. Regards, Jaromir.
Latest upstream release: 5.0.6 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6-10.fc21 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/200/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.1.0 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6-10.fc21 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/200/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 5.1.1 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 4.1.6-12.fc22 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/giflib/mtime/desc/limit/200/rss Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Soon this service will be implemented by a new system: https://release-monitoring.org/ It will require to manage monitored projects via a new web interface. Please make yourself familiar with the new system to ease the transition.
any news on that, are there so many packages that depend on this version ?
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #28) > any news on that, are there so many packages that depend on this version ? API and ABI were changed in releases >4.1 : http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/giflib.html http://giflib.sourceforge.net/gif_lib.html#compatibility And except latest devel releases of Arch, Gentoo and Slackware all major distributions bring 4.1 : http://oswatershed.org/pkg/giflib So don't expect a lot of packages depend on giflib-5. It could be a good idea to have a new giflib-5 package in Fedora to make the transition easier.
I don't feel comfortable with introducing giflib 5 as a new package, because the header files are installed to the same location and conflict with the version 4. That would introduce a new and unnecessary mess in the distribution. I personally don't understand why upstream decided to use the same header path for two incompatible headers.
(In reply to Jaromír Cápík from comment #30) > distribution. I personally don't understand why upstream decided to use the > same header path for two incompatible headers. You could ask upstream to fix that, now that the spread of giflib-5 is limited and very low.
Latest upstream release: 5.1.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.1.6-14.fc24 URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/giflib Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.
Created attachment 1112440 [details] [patch] Update to 5.1.2 (#822844)
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12449129
Latest upstream release: 5.1.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.1.6-15.fc24 URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/giflib Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1158/
Patching or scratch build for giflib and version 4.1.6 FAILED. See for details
Created attachment 1137612 [details] Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file. See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
Latest upstream release: 5.1.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.1.6-15.fc24 URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/giflib Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1158/
Created attachment 1143121 [details] Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file. See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.
(In reply to Upstream Release Monitoring from comment #39) > Latest upstream release: 5.1.4 > Current version/release in rawhide: 4.1.6-15.fc24 > URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/giflib > [...] > Based on the information from anitya: > https://release-monitoring.org/project/1158/ Removed from Anitya, monitoring is not useful for Fedora.
(In reply to Jaromír Cápík from comment #30) > I don't feel comfortable with introducing giflib 5 as a new package, because > the header files are installed to the same location and conflict with the > version 4. That would introduce a new and unnecessary mess in the > distribution. I personally don't understand why upstream decided to use the > same header path for two incompatible headers. Hi Jaromír, Today it does not seem very risky. All others have already done it. https://software.opensuse.org/package/giflib openSUSE-Tumbleweed 5.1.4 openSUSE-Leap-42.1 5.0.5 SLES-12 5.0.5 https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=giflib&searchon=sourcenames&exact=1&suite=all§ion=all https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803158 Debian-sid-unstable 5.1.4 Debian-stretch-testing 5.1.4 Debian-jessie-stable 4.1.6 http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=giflib&searchon=sourcenames&exact=1&suite=all§ion=all Ubuntu-16.04-LTS-xenial 5.1.2 https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=giflib archlinux 5.1.2 http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware64-current/ChangeLog.txt Slackware-14.2rc1 5.1.1 Slackware-14.1 4.1.6 https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-libs/giflib gentoo-testing 5.1.4 gentoo-stable 4.1.6 http://madb.mageia.org/package/show/source/1/application/0/release/cauldron/name/giflib http://madb.mageia.org/package/show/name/giflib/application/0/source/1 Mageia-cauldron 5.1.2 Mageia-5 4.2.3 ~
+1 , could we updated for F27 ? dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires giflib --available --alldeps --qf "%{sourcerpm}" --quiet | sed 's|\(-[^-]\+\)\{2\}src.rpm||' | sort driftnet efl emacs fontforge gdal giflib imlib imlib2 java-1.8.0-openjdk kdelibs kf5-khtml leptonica libextractor libgdiplus librasterlite2 libwebp MagicPoint mapserver mathgl metapixel ming mtpaint ocaml-camlimages OpenImageIO OpenSceneGraph perl-Imager perl-Prima python-gd sxiv tracker vips WindowMaker xemacs xplanet
Perhaps someone could try this out in a copr? ie, build new giflib and then rebuild all the rawhide versions of the above dependent packages against it and see what fails/needs work?
Since leptonica went giflib-5 only, I gave it a shot [1], overall does not look bad most build out of the box, a few need some minor patching. Biggest headache is java-1.8.0-openjdk which has a BR on itself (java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel), resulting in it wanting to pull in also giflib-4. Know nothing about openjdk packaging, so not sure what the best way is to create a bootstrap build for giflib5. My attempt to just leave out BR: giflib-devel ended up in *** SRC specified to SetupNativeCompilation LIBSPLASHSCREEN contains missing directory /builddir/build/BUILD/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.151-3.b12.fc28.x86_64/openjdk/jdk/src/share/native/sun/awt/giflib. Stop. Anyone with any suggestions? Following packages depend on java-1.8.0-openjdk hence could not be build yet: java-9-openjdk libwebp gdal OpenImageIO mapserver And then we have: mathgl: appears to be an unrelated segfault (Generating png/light.png cd /builddir/build/BUILD/mathgl-2.4.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu_serial/texinfo/png && /builddir/build/BUILD/mathgl-2.4.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu_serial/examples/mgl_example -kind=light -> kaboom) imlib: could be patched, but actually has little reason to still exist since the only requiree, MagicPoint, also builds against imlib2. So imlib should just be retired. magicpoint: unrelated FTBFS (error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'png_struct {aka struct png_struct_def}') Should I file a self-contained change for this? [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/giflib5/builds/
Hi, yes and also we may open an nonresponsive process to package owner and take the package
I'll prepare a change page this evening. The non-responsive maintainer process was already done for jcapik [1][2], so I've asked to become owner directly in [2]. [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1786 [2] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7173
Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Smani/Changes/GifLib5
giflib-5.1.4 is now in rawhide