Bug 82570 - More details need to be displayed
More details need to be displayed
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-config-packages (Show other bugs)
8.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-01-23 10:27 EST by Frank Perreault
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-21 16:23:14 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Frank Perreault 2003-01-23 10:27:24 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
Several bugs listed in Bugzilla asking for more information to be displayed when
hitting the Details button.  These include listing the files that are contained
within the package.  For additional  enhancements it would be nice if the group
the files were being installed to was listed as well as the package dependencies.

KPackage (the utility that was removed from RH 8.0 for some crazy reason) should
be used as a guide as to the information that RH needs to display in their own
tool.  For a "normal" user it is fine to hide these details but the info needs
to be displayed when clicking on the Details button.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run utility
2.
3.
    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2003-02-09 16:48:33 EST
These will be considered for a future release
Comment 2 Miloslav Trmac 2003-02-10 10:03:19 EST
See also nautilus-rpm
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2005-09-21 16:23:14 EDT
This report is filed against a product which is no longer supported.  It is very
likely that the problem is resolved in the current version of Fedora Core or
scheduled to be resolved with the new system-config-packages scheduled to land
in Fedora Core 5.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.