Bug 82660 - openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm fails to build on Phoebe #2
Summary: openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm fails to build on Phoebe #2
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: openoffice.org
Version: phoebe
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-01-24 17:10 UTC by Glen A. Foster
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-03 11:51:11 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Output of "rpmbuild -ba" (118.71 KB, text/plain)
2003-01-24 17:10 UTC, Glen A. Foster
no flags Details

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-01-24 17:10:21 UTC
Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of openoffice from the SRPM
fails on an everything install of the second Phoebe beta.  Build log is attached.
                                                                                
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root     113484506 Sep 10 07:36 openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm
# md5sum openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm
f67f11cbf64933860ae31f20fa9df19b  openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm
                                                                                
How Reproducible: always (100%)
                                                                                
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Pheobe #2 "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/openoffice-1.0.1-8.src.rpm
3. rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/openoffice.spec
                                                                                
Actual Results:
Out of "rpmbuild -ba" is attached
                                                                                
Expected Results:
Successful build

Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-01-24 17:10:58 UTC
Created attachment 89582 [details]
Output of "rpmbuild -ba"

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2003-01-24 18:16:48 UTC
This is known problem and will go away once (if) we include openoffice-1.0.2.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.