Description of problem: Protocol client is not sending the gfid of the file when the fop is fsetattr or rchecksum. struct gfs3_fsetattr_req { quad_t fd; struct gf_iatt stbuf; int valid; struct { u_int xdata_len; char *xdata_val; } xdata; }; typedef struct gfs3_fsetattr_req gfs3_fsetattr_req; struct gfs3_rchecksum_req { quad_t fd; u_quad_t offset; u_int len; struct { u_int xdata_len; char *xdata_val; } xdata; }; typedef struct gfs3_rchecksum_req gfs3_rchecksum_req; Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: gfid is not sent to protocol server in the request structure for fsetattr amd rcheckdum. Expected results: gfid is sent with all other fd based fops. Additional info:
http://review.gluster.org/3956
When this gets accepted, please also file a Bug at bugs.wireshark.org, or let me know and I'll look into extending the glusterfs dissectors.
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#2) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#3) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#4) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#5) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#6) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#7) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#8) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#9) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#10) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/3956 (protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum) posted (#12) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice. If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17656 (protocol: bring new version) posted (#1) for review on experimental by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17656 committed in experimental by Amar Tumballi (amarts) ------ commit 73d944d627bf747e2e3117b434d685b350c8b816 Author: Amar Tumballi <amarts> Date: Fri Jun 30 13:12:22 2017 +0530 protocol: bring new version Change-Id: Icaf8c027d04e142f2d36ae7df75c4aae5b21325f BUG: 827334 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17656 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/3956 (rpc: bring a new protocol version) posted (#13) for review on master by Amar Tumballi (amarts)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/3956 committed in master by ------------- rpc: bring a new protocol version * xdr: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum * as it is change in on wire XDR format, needed backward compatible RPC programs. Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts> BUG: 827334 Change-Id: Id0a2da3632516dc1a5560dde2b151b2e5f0be8e5
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-4.0.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-4.0.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-March/000092.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/