Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 82768 - after updates I now get this error. to a file i never ever touched /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2/include/stddef.h:201: syntax error before "typedef"
after updates I now get this error. to a file i never ever touched /usr/lib/g...
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: gcc (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Jelinek
Brian Brock
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-01-25 22:10 EST by 3356ka
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:50 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-10-03 15:39:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description 3356ka 2003-01-25 22:10:38 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
I get this error when I compile my program that depends on this file

/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2/include/stddef.h:201: syntax error before

My files are sound its stddef.h that has an issue how do i fix.

2 friends of mine also have the same issue after they updated with auto update.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install RH8
2.Run the auto update that does internet updates
3.Try to compile anyuthing that requires sttdef

Actual Results:  I'm told error can't compile 

/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2/include/stddef.h:201: syntax error before

Expected Results:  a clean make!

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2003-01-26 16:48:17 EST
Cannot reproduce (and stddef.h has not changed BTW).
Do you see it even with say
echo '#include <stddef.h>' | gcc -c -xc - -o /tmp/test.o
If not, can you post what is the minimal way you are able to reproduce it with?
Also, -dD dump would be very useful.
Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2004-10-03 15:39:25 EDT
No feedback, closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.