Bug 829102 - qemu-supplied SystemTap tapsets cause errors
Summary: qemu-supplied SystemTap tapsets cause errors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 831763
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qemu
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-06 01:36 UTC by Nicholas Miell
Modified: 2013-01-09 12:03 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-10 11:23:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nicholas Miell 2012-06-06 01:36:48 UTC
parse error: expected statement
	saw: keyword at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-kvm.stp:1139:3
     source:   in = $arg3;
               ^
parse error: expected literal string or number
	saw: operator '=' at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-kvm.stp:2078:8
     source:   next = $arg1;
                    ^
2 parse errors.
parse error: expected statement
	saw: keyword at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-system-i386.stp:1139:3
     source:   in = $arg3;
               ^
parse error: expected literal string or number
	saw: operator '=' at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-system-i386.stp:2078:8
     source:   next = $arg1;
                    ^
2 parse errors.
parse error: expected statement
	saw: keyword at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-system-x86_64.stp:1139:3
     source:   in = $arg3;
               ^
parse error: expected literal string or number
	saw: operator '=' at /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/qemu-system-x86_64.stp:2078:8
     source:   next = $arg1;
                    ^
2 parse errors.

"in" and "next" are both SystemTap keywords.

Comment 1 Paolo Bonzini 2012-06-11 07:43:08 UTC
This has been fixed upstream already for "next", but "in" still remains and will still cause syntax errors.

usb_host_req_data(int bus, int addr, void *p, int in, int ep, int size) "dev %d:%d, packet %p, in %d, ep %d, size %d"

Gerd, can you look at this?

Comment 2 Cole Robinson 2012-07-10 11:23:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 831763 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.