Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch selinux-policy-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: # id -Z root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 # sestatus SELinux status: enabled SELinuxfs mount: /selinux Current mode: enforcing Mode from config file: enforcing Policy version: 24 Policy from config file: mls # chkconfig cgconfig on failed to make symlink /etc/rc0.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc1.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc6.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc0.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc1.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc6.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/S05cgconfig: Permission denied failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/S05cgconfig: Permission denied failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/S05cgconfig: Permission denied failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/S05cgconfig: Permission denied # chkconfig cgconfig off failed to make symlink /etc/rc0.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc1.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc6.d/K00rgmanager: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc0.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc1.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc6.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc2.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc3.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc4.d/K95cgconfig: File exists failed to make symlink /etc/rc5.d/K95cgconfig: File exists # Actual results: ---- time->Wed Jun 6 13:03:39 2012 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1338980619.861:180): arch=40000003 syscall=83 success=no exit=-13 a0=bfe626bc a1=bfe62784 a2=bfe62784 a3=bfe626bc items=0 ppid=1300 pid=1389 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts0 ses=1 comm="chkconfig" exe="/sbin/chkconfig" subj=root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 key=(null) type=AVC msg=audit(1338980619.861:180): avc: denied { create } for pid=1389 comm="chkconfig" name="S05cgconfig" scontext=root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=root:object_r:etc_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file ---- time->Wed Jun 6 13:03:42 2012 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1338980622.399:182): arch=40000003 syscall=10 success=no exit=-13 a0=8761220 a1=8761150 a2=1 a3=8759fe8 items=0 ppid=1300 pid=1390 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts0 ses=1 comm="chkconfig" exe="/sbin/chkconfig" subj=root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 key=(null) type=AVC msg=audit(1338980622.399:182): avc: denied { unlink } for pid=1390 comm="chkconfig" name="K00rgmanager" dev=vda3 ino=138673 scontext=root:sysadm_r:sysadm_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=root:object_r:etc_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file ---- Expected results: * no AVCs
On the other hand it works when run_init chkconfig ... is used. Do we have a proper documentation for such a scenario?
We have fixed this one in Fedora.
Yes we should back port the fix.
This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
This also affects targeted policy with unconfined removed.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0314.html