Bug 829349 - Rebase openscap package to meet the SCAP 1.2 specification
Summary: Rebase openscap package to meet the SCAP 1.2 specification
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openscap
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Peter Vrabec
QA Contact: Ondrej Moriš
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 772279 836170 840699 872248 922209
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-06 14:23 UTC by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2013-03-15 17:56 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:43:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0362 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openscap bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:53:02 UTC

Description Steve Grubb 2012-06-06 14:23:04 UTC
Description of problem:
The openscap package needs to be updated to meet the SCAP 1.2 specification. This is the current and expected support level for SCAP scanners.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 07:13:51 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 01:45:20 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:43:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0362.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.