Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 830554

Summary: webadmin: when importing vm with multiple disks and selecting different target domains we see the disks not in correct order
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Dafna Ron <dron>
Component: ovirt-engine-userportalAssignee: Gilad Chaplik <gchaplik>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Dafna Ron <dron>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.1.0CC: acathrow, dfediuck, dyasny, ecohen, iheim, Rhev-m-bugs, ykaul
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: virt
Fixed In Version: si10 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 20:00:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screen shot none

Description Dafna Ron 2012-06-10 15:25:13 UTC
Created attachment 590758 [details]
screen shot

Description of problem:

when importing a vm with multiple disks and selecting several domains target, the disks appear unorginized. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

si4

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.try to import a disk with multiple disks to multiple domains
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

disk appears disorginized

Expected results:

we should present the disk by alphabet

Additional info: screen shot

Comment 1 Itamar Heim 2012-06-10 15:43:35 UTC
I wouldn't presume the "right" order is to sort by name.
the "right" order would probably be based on device addressing or something like that.
ayal - thoughts?

Comment 2 Ayal Baron 2012-06-17 10:09:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> I wouldn't presume the "right" order is to sort by name.
> the "right" order would probably be based on device addressing or something
> like that.

When choosing the target storage domain for each disk? I tend to agree with dafna that sorting by name is better.

Comment 4 Gilad Chaplik 2012-06-20 09:29:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> merged upstream
> (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine.git;a=commit;
> h=c240668147420ac64712b65c73cf725e5571ce19)

also fixed in import template.

Comment 5 Dafna Ron 2012-07-12 16:31:11 UTC
verified on si10