Bug 83087 – C++ STL "string" does not compile in 2.96-112.7.2.i386 version

Bug 83087 - C++ STL "string" does not compile in 2.96-112.7.2.i386 version

Summary:	C++ STL "string" does not compile in 2.96-112.7.2.i386 version

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	gcc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.2
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-01-29 23:14 EST by Michael Furman
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:50 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-02-01 11:01:46 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Michael Furman 2003-01-29 23:14:40 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)

Description of problem:
I insatalled gcc/g++ RPM 2.96-112.7.2.i386 and found that file
"g++-3/std/bastring.h" has error in the line # 343 in the 
statement "if(length() == 0) return "";" : if the string template
is instantiated with the differen then "char" base type (in my case
it was wide character) compilation fail ("" is a pointer to char and
it cannot be used/casted as/to pointer to the different type).



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Define a string of wide characters;
2.call method "c_str()"

    

Actual Results:  Compilation error

Expected Results:  no error

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2003-02-01 11:01:46 EST

libstdc++ before the rewrite which showed up in GCC 3.0 doesn't support wide
chars (with the exception of the latest RHAS version).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.