Created attachment 591647 [details] Look at the bottom for "pollution" Description of problem: Upon fresh install of FC17, the enviornment is polluted with all sorts of fucntions and I'm assuming this is related to have the user account jetty installed as well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): "Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle)" Linux BlackKnight 3.4.0-1.fc17.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sun Jun 3 06:54:54 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux How reproducible: Always from FC17 DVD install Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download fresh dvd install iso, burn disk 2. Install 3. Review SET and User accounts Actual results: Attached: set dump Expected results: No pollution/code in main enviornment, no user jetty or others not specified at install time Additional info:
Realize this cant be fixed until next release or rebuild of dvd-iso, cant we at least id what packages to uninstall and what other "pollution" is left over from automation test I presume?
This is the bash-completion package - it's not an automation test, it's a feature, to provide more functionality for bash users. If you don't like it... remove it? Not sure there's anything else to be done.
Thanks for the response Bill, I've not noticed all the pollution under the el 5/6 series and dont recall seeing such a heavily populated enviornmment in fc xx. I'll dump the package,reboot and see if its gone. (there is a _udisks function in el6 ) This didnt resolve why user "jetty" is loaded.
bash-completion in the default install was a feature request that was added during the F17 cycle. Looking at what requires jetty, it was likely brought in via Eclipse or Maven. What did you choose to install?
Bill; Again, many thanks for your response, I had installed the eclipse and packager groups, Maven is installed by default for that group so I dont know which installed it but I manually removed. I'm curious why the security folks didnt balk about packages (non-service related) installed a "user". Oh well, mystery solved, contained and rectified, but its clear to me that what I consider to be clean, is not phisiophically embraced or enforced. Not a big deal, you say tomAto, I say tOmato ;) -Chuck