RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 834504 - RFE: print more informative error on host subject mismatch
Summary: RFE: print more informative error on host subject mismatch
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: spice-gtk
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.4
Assignee: Christophe Fergeau
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-22 06:43 UTC by David Jaša
Modified: 2013-02-21 08:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: spice-gtk-0.14-1.el6
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: Better error message when invalid SSL certificates/SSL options are passed to QEMU Reason: Result (if any):
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:47:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0343 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE spice-gtk bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:53:54 UTC

Description David Jaša 2012-06-22 06:43:41 UTC
Description of problem:
print more informative error on host subject mismatch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spice-gtk-0.11-11

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a server certificate with Subject containing CN=$IP (or CN=$FQDN)
2. start a spice-server: qemu-kvm -spice tls-port=$PORT,x509-dir=$DIR
3. connect to a server with:
remote-viewer --spice-ca-file $CACERT spice://$FQDN/?tls-port=$PORT
(or remote-viewer --spice-ca-file $CACERT spice://$IP/?tls-port=$PORT
  
Actual results:
remote-viewer presents raw OpenSSL error:
GSpice-WARNING **: main-1:0: SSL_connect: error:00000001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)

Expected results:
remote-viewer should print error like this instead:
Host Subject mismatch: server presented itself with subject: "$SUBJ"

Additional info:

Comment 1 Christophe Fergeau 2012-06-22 09:52:23 UTC
In such a case, there is not really a subject mismatch. remote-viewer is not passed a host subject parameter, so it won't attempt to verify it.
What will happen here is that hostname verification will be attempted, and if this fails, the connection will fail.
So I'm not sure we want to report a host subject mismatch here.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:04:50 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 02:00:38 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 4 Christophe Fergeau 2012-07-13 16:08:06 UTC
This should be addressed by http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-common/commit/?id=bf5511033d5d6fb98cd597699a725183ae078b62

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:47:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0343.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.