Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionStephan Edelman
2012-06-24 22:16:06 UTC
Description of problem:
Kernel periodically reports in syslog:
JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sda3, blocknr = XXXXXXX). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.x86_64
How reproducible:
This problem appears to reveal itself only when the system is under heavy memory pressure.
Steps to Reproduce:
(1) Reduce available free memory (For example, edit /etc/sysctl.conf and set vm.swappiness=1 and vm.nr_hugepages=XXXX. Where XXXX is the available free memory in MB / 2. Then run sysctl -p)
(2) Run iozone -a -i 0 -i 1 -s 524288 -f /var/testfile (where /var is an EXT4 filesystem mounted with data=journal)
Actual results:
JBD error messages in syslog
Expected results:
No error messages in syslog
Additional info:
This issue appears to be described in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/13/228
EXT4 file system mounted with data=journal,noatime,nodiratime,barrier=0 mount options.
File system is plain (no LVM) on a RAID 1 SAS using an Intel RS2BL040 controller (FW Package Build: 12.7.0-0007)
Changing mount options from data=journal to data=ordered does not produce the warning under the same conditions. It appears that it is therefore unsafe to use full journaling until this bug is corrected, as recovery after a crash may be much worse than for the default data=ordered mode.
Hi Stephen,
Please open a support ticket with Red Hat support so they can help you dig into this.
In general, I would recommend avoid data=journal mode since it is not well tested.
Best regards,
Ric Wheeler
Comment 3RHEL Program Management
2012-12-14 08:26:07 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 6RHEL Program Management
2013-07-24 10:11:02 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1645.html