Bug 835949 - [rhevm] PosixFS: contending storm when adding additional host to pool
[rhevm] PosixFS: contending storm when adding additional host to pool
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 835920
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
urgent Severity urgent
: ---
: 3.1.0
Assigned To: Laszlo Hornyak
: TestBlocker
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2012-06-27 11:45 EDT by Haim
Modified: 2016-02-10 11:36 EST (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-07-10 01:49:30 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
engine.log (125.93 KB, application/x-gzip)
2012-06-27 11:45 EDT, Haim
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Haim 2012-06-27 11:45:58 EDT
Created attachment 594820 [details]

Description of problem:

my case:

- 1 host in pool based on posix file-system storage domain
- pool is up and host is spm
- add additional host to pool
- backend send spmStop to host 1
- backend send spmStart to host 1

repeats the following in a loop (each time different host). 

no erros on VDS, the following log look suspicious:

2012-06-27 21:44:42,444 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.GetStoragePoolInfoVDSCommand] (QuartzScheduler_Worker-70) [1bc9b5e6] irsBroker::BuildStorageDynamicFromXmlRpcStruct::Failed building Storage dynamic, xmlRpcStruct = org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.xmlrpc.XmlRpcStruct@11b7121
Comment 2 Laszlo Hornyak 2012-07-09 10:36:24 EDT
Actual reason hiddin inside the bug:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No enum const class org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.StorageType.SHAREDFS
Comment 3 Laszlo Hornyak 2012-07-09 13:17:26 EDT
Comment 4 mkublin 2012-07-10 01:49:30 EDT
Doing what Laszlo proposed, closing all similar bugs as duplicates

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 835920 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.