Bug 83767 - RFE: provide rfb packages to provide x0rfbserver functionality
RFE: provide rfb packages to provide x0rfbserver functionality
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: vnc (Show other bugs)
8.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
David Lawrence
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-02-07 20:14 EST by Need Real Name
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:50 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-08-06 06:13:51 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2003-02-07 20:14:57 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.6 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
Code has been written to allow you to connect a vncviewer
to your main (display :0) desktop.  KDE has a package that
inlcudes this code, and mandrake supports it as well.

Operationally, you run 'x0rfbserver' in you X session and
then you can VNC to your main desktop remotely.  Very useful,
a great addition to Redhat now that you are beginning to 
undertake greater desktop support.

The source and (scant) documentation can be found at

http://forum.hexonet.com/





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.look for rfb package
2.give up
3.
    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2003-02-11 06:02:59 EST
We used to provide the rfb package in powertools, in fact.

But x0rfbserver is a nonoptimal solution to the problem.  A better solution
would be to ship xf4vnc, or something like it, which has much *much* less overhead.
Comment 2 Need Real Name 2003-02-11 11:23:40 EST
I have looked at xf4vnc, at from what I can tell I believe that you are
right.  It has more configuration overhead, but if Redhat made it a
supported package I would expect that to become a non-issue.

How about throwing it in with RandR configuration support?  You know,
one more tab in the 'display properties' configuration tool?  I don't
know anything about your XFree configuration direction, so take these
suggestions with a grain of salt.

Anyway, xf4vnc or rfb, we need at least one.  In my last job, that kind
of administrative tool was very much appreciated; you can make a case for
this being an important part of the 'corporate desktop'.


Thanks.
Comment 3 Need Real Name 2003-08-10 00:06:53 EDT
Closed rawhide?  What package in rawhide provides this functionality?
Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2003-08-10 06:12:42 EDT
vnc

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.