Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Depending on the design there will be more or less libvirt impact, possibly none. Jiri, please talk to Eduardo about the design and see what you think.
So far the direction seems to be that qemu-kvm will implement CPU models that will differ according to the machine type used. This will be completely transparent to libvirt. Libvirt will think SandyBridge model will always contain TSC-deadline feature.
(In reply to comment #6)
> So far the direction seems to be that qemu-kvm will implement CPU models
> that will differ according to the machine type used. This will be completely
> transparent to libvirt. Libvirt will think SandyBridge model will always
> contain TSC-deadline feature.
Yes, that's the plan: to implement in the in qemu-kvm in a way that doesn't affect libvirt (or affect it only in minor ways, like in the case of TSC-deadline).
I think this can be closed as NOTABUG, as long as there's a TSC-deadline-specific bug already open for libvirt.
OK, bug 804749 tracks the addition of TSC-deadline to SandyBridge model; I'm closing this bug. BTW, Eduardo, could you update the qemu-kvm bug 833152 with the current plan?
The right solution is still not finalized upstream but there's a possibility some changes will be needed in the way libvirt probes for available CPU models. I'll keep this bug open as a reminder...
The solution for qemu has been agreed on upstream and no work needs to be done on libvirt. I'm marking this bug as TestOnly. Before testing it, please, wait until bug 833152 is done.
Add migration test.
Ping-Pong migrating rhel6.3 guest (-cpu SandyBridge) between RHEL6.4 and RHEL6.3 host (Both hosts are SandyBridge)
Steps
From host A to host B
# virsh migrate rhel6.3 --live qemu+ssh://host B ip/system
Check tsc_deadline_timer flag in guest, no tsc_deadline_timer
# cat /proc/cpuinfo|grep tsc_deadline_timer
From host B to host A
# virsh migrate rhel6.3 --live qemu+ssh://host A ip/system
Check tsc_deadline_timer flag in guest, no tsc_deadline_timer
# cat /proc/cpuinfo|grep tsc_deadline_timer
Result:
The guset rhel6.3 doesn't have tsc_deadline_timer flag on both hosts.
Ping-Pong migrating rhel6.4 guest (-cpu SandyBridge) guest between RHEL6.4 and RHEL6.4 host (Both hosts are SandyBridge)
Result:
The guset rhel6.4 always has tsc_deadline_timer flag on both hosts.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0276.html