Bug 839281 - manpage: mount option inode_readahead for ext4 should be inode_readahead_blks
Summary: manpage: mount option inode_readahead for ext4 should be inode_readahead_blks
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: util-linux-ng
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Karel Zak
QA Contact: Branislav Blaškovič
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-07-11 12:55 UTC by Eryu Guan
Modified: 2013-02-21 10:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.8.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:23:15 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:0517 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: util-linux-ng security, bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 21:29:06 UTC

Description Eryu Guan 2012-07-11 12:55:20 UTC
Description of problem:
mount option inode_readahead should be inode_readahead_blks

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.7.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. man mount and search inode_readahead
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Eryu Guan 2012-07-11 12:56:50 UTC
I sent a patch upstream to fix this, hope that patch can be accepted
http://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=134201127101708&w=2

Comment 6 Branislav Blaškovič 2012-12-10 13:40:11 UTC
Fix verified:

  # rpm -q util-linux-ng
  util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.8.el6

  # man 8 moun
       inode_readahead_blks=n
              This  tuning  parameter  controls  the  maximum  number of inode table blocks that
              ext4’s inode table readahead algorithm will pre-read into the buffer  cache.   The
              value must be a power of 2. The default value is 32 blocks.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:23:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.