Bug 839890
| Summary: | Negotiation Guide: users.properties should be replaced by roles.properties (for roles mapping) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5 | Reporter: | Josef Cacek <jcacek> |
| Component: | doc-Admin_and_Config_Guide | Assignee: | Scott Mumford <smumford> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Rajesh Rajasekaran <rrajasek> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.1.2, 5.1.3 | CC: | jcacek, olukas |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation, EasyFix, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | docrebuild (5.x) | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-05-15 04:41:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Josef Cacek
2012-07-13 07:10:51 UTC
This issue appears to have been resolved: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/5/html/Negotiation_User_Guide/sect-Role_Mapping.html#idp4305520 Advancing ticket to QA. There is still one problem left. 2.4.1. - point 2: Instead of "$JBOSS_HOME/server/$PROFILE/conf/props/spnego-users.properties" use "$JBOSS_HOME/server/$PROFILE/conf/props/roles.properties" This last reference to 'spegno-users.properties' has been replaced with 'roles.properties'. The change will appear in the next update push to the docs stage. Reassigning to docs lead to request rebuild of EAP 5 Admin & Config Guide. Have requested doc rebuild to reflect fix. There appears to be references to spnego-roles.properties in the example code in chapter 2.3. 'Defining Application Security Domain' (1). Should these be removed as well, or do they conform to the rule? 1: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/5/html-single/Negotiation_User_Guide/index.html#applicationSecurityDomain Moving ticket to ON_QA as the orignal request has been satisfied. If the issue mentioned in comment 6 needs addressing, please comment to that effect and return ticket to ASSIGNED. |