RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 840009 - rule6-* files are ignored for sit devices
Summary: rule6-* files are ignored for sit devices
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: initscripts
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Lukáš Nykrýn
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-07-13 12:48 UTC by David Kostal
Modified: 2016-11-25 13:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 22:10:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fix for ifup-sit/ifdown-sit scripts to process rule6-* files (1.46 KB, patch)
2012-07-13 12:48 UTC, David Kostal
no flags Details | Diff
use ip{up,down}-routes with sit (1.08 KB, patch)
2012-08-07 10:48 UTC, Lukáš Nykrýn
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1679 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE initscripts bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:52:39 UTC

Description David Kostal 2012-07-13 12:48:18 UTC
Created attachment 598065 [details]
Fix for ifup-sit/ifdown-sit scripts to process rule6-* files

Description of problem:
When activating IP6 over IP4 tunnel, the route6-* files are processed but rule6-* are not.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
9.03.27-1.el6

How reproducible:
allways when starting/stopping IP6 tunnel via ifup/ifdown scripts

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-he6 as TYPE=sit and file etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule6-he6 with proper rules.
2. ifup he6
3. 
  
Actual results:
"ip -6 ru ls" does NOT show rules defined in rule6-he6 file

Expected results:
"ip -6 ru ls" should show rules rules defined in rule6-he6 file

Additional info:
Adding ip6 rules works for regular interfaces (eg. eth0). Patch fixing this issue is attached.

Comment 2 Lukáš Nykrýn 2012-08-01 08:14:11 UTC
Thanks for the patch, I see no reason why not to include it.

Comment 4 Lukáš Nykrýn 2012-08-07 10:48:55 UTC
Created attachment 602716 [details]
use ip{up,down}-routes with sit

Bill suggested that we should use ifup-routes and ifdown-routes. Can you please try attached patch?

Comment 5 David Kostal 2012-08-07 11:46:48 UTC
The new patch works well for me. Thanks!

Comment 7 Lukáš Nykrýn 2013-04-02 16:52:38 UTC
upstream commit d232acc90d7ebc2beba5e4ef6f9ffa6ab7f9b795

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 22:10:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1679.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.