Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 84007 - error on install after Solaris fsck
error on install after Solaris fsck
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer (Show other bugs)
7.3
i586 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Michael Fulbright
Brock Organ
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2003-02-10 17:04 EST by Josh Robinson
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:50 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-10 22:06:55 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
dump file with error (8.00 KB, text/plain)
2003-02-10 17:05 EST, Josh Robinson 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Josh Robinson 2003-02-10 17:04:22 EST 
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. install Solaris with possible bad disk (unrecoverable fsck)
2. load RH Linux 7.3
3. choose 200M Swap, check for bad blocks, fill rest of drive with the root partition, choose check for bad blocks. 
    
Actual results:


Expected results:
find the bad blocks, install RH 7.3

Additional info:
In Solaris this thing was really baffed as well so I wasn't really expecting wonderful results from any OS, but the code asked me to sumbit a bug report. So, here ya go guys!
Comment 1 Josh Robinson 2003-02-10 17:05:28 EST 
Created attachment 89979 [details]
dump file with error
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2003-02-10 22:06:55 EST 
This is fixed in Red Hat Linux 8.0
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.