Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
Got email from Rob Evers when checking max_luns support with him, he found a bug for miss leading print about max_report_luns. Quote:
====
There is a misleading print that is related:
From
num_luns = (length / sizeof(struct scsi_lun));
if (num_luns > max_scsi_report_luns) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: On %s only %d (max_scsi_report_luns)"
" of %d luns reported, try increasing"
" max_scsi_report_luns.\n", devname,
max_scsi_report_luns, num_luns);
num_luns = max_scsi_report_luns;
}
====
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
quote: "Looks like a bug in rhel6/rhel7/upstream as well."
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Incorrect kernel message for max_support_luns.
Expected results:
correct info.
Additional info:
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Got email from Rob Evers when checking max_luns support with him, he found a
> bug for miss leading print about max_report_luns. Quote:
> ====
> There is a misleading print that is related:
>
> From
>
> num_luns = (length / sizeof(struct scsi_lun));
> if (num_luns > max_scsi_report_luns) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: On %s only %d (max_scsi_report_luns)"
> " of %d luns reported, try increasing"
> " max_scsi_report_luns.\n", devname,
> max_scsi_report_luns, num_luns);
> num_luns = max_scsi_report_luns;
> }
> ====
>
looks like print above should be:
"try increasing max_report_luns" above.
Comment 3RHEL Program Management
2013-10-14 04:52:55 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1272.html
Description of problem: Got email from Rob Evers when checking max_luns support with him, he found a bug for miss leading print about max_report_luns. Quote: ==== There is a misleading print that is related: From num_luns = (length / sizeof(struct scsi_lun)); if (num_luns > max_scsi_report_luns) { printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: On %s only %d (max_scsi_report_luns)" " of %d luns reported, try increasing" " max_scsi_report_luns.\n", devname, max_scsi_report_luns, num_luns); num_luns = max_scsi_report_luns; } ==== Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): quote: "Looks like a bug in rhel6/rhel7/upstream as well." How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Incorrect kernel message for max_support_luns. Expected results: correct info. Additional info: