Bug 840956
| Summary: | ns-slapd dirsrv_t netlink_route_socket denials | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] 389 | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
| Component: | Security - General | Assignee: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 1.2.8 | CC: | benl, dwalsh, jhrozek, jplans, ksrot, mgrepl, mmalik, nkinder, shaines |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 740925 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2013-03-04 22:28:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 740925 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Orion Poplawski
2012-07-17 17:04:56 UTC
Seen in EL5 with selinux-policy-2.4.6-329.el5 This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. We need to backport it. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. Hi, could you please post a comment why this bug has been moved to nss_ldap and should be fixed here? Thank you. dirsrv policy is not part of the base policy in RHEL5. There is no SELinux policy in nss_ldap either. Did you mean to reassign the bug to Directory Server? I believe this was intended to be assigned to Directory Server. Red Hat Directory Server on RHEL5 is not confined by SELinux at all. The reporter appears to be using 389-ds-base bits from EPEL. This is not a RHEL bug, but should be an upstream 389 bug/ticket. Moving the bug to the appropriate product. (In reply to comment #9) > I believe this was intended to be assigned to Directory Server. Red Hat > Directory Server on RHEL5 is not confined by SELinux at all. > Yes, I apologize. > The reporter appears to be using 389-ds-base bits from EPEL. This is not a > RHEL bug, but should be an upstream 389 bug/ticket. Moving the bug to the > appropriate product. Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/420 This was not reproducible by the upstream development team. See the upstream ticket mentioned in comment#11 for details. Closing this bug. |