Description of problem: SystemTap reports "semantic error: no match" on libjvm markers when the handler is using any $var access, even though the markers are found without $var use. This has only been seen as an issue on i686; x86_64 seems fine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): systemtap-1.8-1.fc17.i686 elfutils-0.154-1.fc17.i686 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3-2.2.1.fc17.8.i686 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. stap -e 'probe process(@1).mark("*") { println($foo) }' -p2 $JVM (The fact that $foo is bad here is irrelevant, just me being lazy. The result should look more like the error x86_64 prints in "Expected results".) Actual results: > $ JVM=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so > $ stap -e 'probe process(@1).mark("*") { println($foo) }' -p2 $JVM > semantic error: while resolving probe point: identifier 'process' at <input>:1:7 > source: probe process(@1).mark("*") { println($foo) } > ^ > > semantic error: no match > Pass 2: analysis failed. Try again with another '--vp 01' option. Expected results: > $ JVM=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > $ stap -e 'probe process(@1).mark("*") { println($foo) }' -p2 $JVM > semantic error: unable to find local 'foo' near pc 0x37342d in <unknown> /usr/src/debug/java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/services/classLoadingService.cpp ( (alternatives: $data $len $name): identifier '$foo' at <input>:1:39 > source: probe process(@1).mark("*") { println($foo) } > ^ > > Pass 2: analysis failed. Try again with another '--vp 01' option. It's still an error, because I used invalid $foo instead of bothering to find a common $var across all markers, or to isolate a single marker. But it's the *right* error. Additional info: I've started this bug against systemtap, but only because I don't know the root cause yet. There seems to be a real problem in the debuginfo that leads us into this corner. Certainly systemtap is wrong in the way it reacts to this failure, with a completely misleading "not found" error message. I'll file a bug upstream to address that on its own. When we locate an SDT marker, stap takes different paths depending on the presence of $vars in the handler. Without any $var, we just build the probe directly, and life is good. With a $var, we decide we need debuginfo, and so that goes down the query_addr path, until we reach a failure at calling elfutils dwfl_module_addrdie(). The given address is within the range of the queried module. Then mjw asked me if elfutils is lying, i.e. is there a DIE/CU that ought to be returned here? And now I find that something is really suspicious with the debuginfo. The first clue is simply in size: > $ ls -sh /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so.debug > 32M /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so.debug vs. > $ ls -sh /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so.debug > 200M /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so.debug And looking at those with eu-readelf shows only *three* CUs in i386, vs. 555 CUs in amd64. The only three survivors in i386 are: > /usr/src/debug/java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/memory/compactingPermGenGen.cpp > /usr/src/debug/java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/sharedRuntimeTrans.cpp > /usr/src/debug/java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/sharedRuntimeTrig.cpp Surely there's more to libjvm.so than that! ;) But whether this is an issue in compiler generation or debuginfo stripping or something else, I don't know...
(In reply to comment #0) > Certainly systemtap is wrong in the way it reacts to this failure, with a > completely misleading "not found" error message. I'll file a bug upstream > to address that on its own. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14369
Both: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3-2.2.1.fc17.8.i686 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.fc18.10.i686 are built with -gstabs: readelf -Wa java-1.7.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.fc18.10.x86_64/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.5.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so.debug [28] .stab PROGBITS 00000000 000120 143e9f8 0c 29 0 4 [29] .stabstr STRTAB 00000000 143eb18 83a505 00 0 0 1 x86_64 does not contain .stab section and it has also significantly larger debuginfo rpm: 15683585 java-1.7.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.7.0.3-2.2.1.fc17.8.i686.rpm 57968721 java-1.7.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.7.0.3-2.2.1.fc17.8.x86_64.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/java-1.7.0-openjdk/1.7.0.5/2.2.1.fc18.10/data/logs/i686/build.log g++ [...] -m32 -march=i586 -pipe -g -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs -DVM_LITTLE_ENDIAN [...] /builddir/build/BUILD/java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/services/classLoadingService.cpp because: java-1.7.0-openjdk/openjdk/hotspot/make/linux/makefiles/gcc.make DEBUG_CFLAGS/ia64 = -g DEBUG_CFLAGS/amd64 = -g DEBUG_CFLAGS/arm = -g DEBUG_CFLAGS/ppc = -g DEBUG_CFLAGS += $(DEBUG_CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH)) ifeq ($(DEBUG_CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH)),) DEBUG_CFLAGS += -gstabs endif But i486 is missing in this list! (Probably also for FASTDEBUG_CFLAGS and OPT_CFLAGS below it.)
Assigning to jvanek (maintainer) and adding ahughes (our buildsys expert, for comments) to cc:
There's already a patch for this, but it may need some work before going upstream to OpenJDK. However, it should be possible to add it to the Fedora spec file straight away in order to resolve this issue.
Fixed in OpenJDK8: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/282abd0fd878 and committed to IcedTea7: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/icedtea/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c5430c659d54 I'll get it backported to 7u.
This should be fixed in: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.6-2.3.fc17.2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.6-2.3.fc16.3
I just tried java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.6-2.3.1.fc17.2.i686, looks good - thanks!
This message is a reminder that Fedora 17 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 17. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '17'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 17 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 17 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-07-30. Fedora 17 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.