Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 843161

Summary: Content Search: Compare - need tooltips or other methods to extend long lines in fields.
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Jason E. Rist <jrist>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.1CC: asettle, dmacpher, mmccune, omaciel, snansi
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Using Content Search Compare cut the the repository and the package names. This disabled the ability to view the full name of each. This fix adds tool tips that pop up on mouse hover.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 19:48:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot none

Description Corey Welton 2012-07-25 18:34:22 UTC
Description of problem:

In a content search compare,  when user  is reviewing packages between two or more repos, both the repo names themselves and the package names tend to get ellipsed... but there is no way to really view the full name, so it can get confusing.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Katello Version: 0.2.49-1.git.2.b978990.el6_3 

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Sync two different similar RH repos, such as RHEL 6.2 and RHEL 6.3, or RHEL 6.3 x86_64 and RHEL6.3 i386
2. Content Search, choose a Content Type of Repos
3. Select your RH repos for comparison and submit
4. View results
  
Actual results:
Long names are ellipsed but it is impossible to tell which package belongs to which repo.

Expected results:
Some sort of tooltip or method to assure we can readily identify packages and repos.

Additional info:

ehelms has indicated that this might be in a future rev, but wanted to make sure we had a bz for testing/usability purposes.

Comment 1 Corey Welton 2012-07-25 18:36:36 UTC
Created attachment 600374 [details]
screenshot

Comment 2 Corey Welton 2012-07-26 15:12:29 UTC
Package and possibly errata descriptions within a repo should have this too.

Comment 3 Mike McCune 2012-08-07 15:46:50 UTC
ON_DEV, fixed in master

Comment 5 Corey Welton 2012-09-18 16:31:48 UTC
QE Verified.

CloudForms System Engine Version: 1.1.12-7.el6cf

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 19:48:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html

Comment 8 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 17:56:39 UTC
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist