Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/gnome-boxes-nonfree.spec SRPM URL: http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/itstool-1.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This package contains the nonfree data for Boxes. Unlike rest of the Boxes contents, product logos are not licensed under LGPLv2+ and hence the need to ship it in a separate pacakge. For more details on the rationale for the existance package/repository: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671251 Boxes has acquired explicit permission from trademark owners for the usage and shipment of their logos. Please note that this permission does not extend to any derivate work but only applies to Boxes for the very specific purpose of identifying the products in question. Fedora Account System Username: zeenix
Sorry, wrong SRPM URL. Here is the correct one: http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/gnome-boxes-nonfree-0.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm You'll note that I've put 'LGPLv2+' as the Licence but thats not true. Looking at this page, I don't see which would be the right value here though so please let me know which value is appropriate and I'll use that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Content_Licenses Also please note that these logos were previously shipped with gnome-boxes package itself and we have been in communication with Fedora legal about this issue: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2012-February/011360.html
Please use: License: Licensed only for approved usage, see COPYING for details.
(In reply to comment #2) > Please use: > > License: Licensed only for approved usage, see COPYING for details. Thanks! I updated the files: http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/gnome-boxes-nonfree.spec http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/gnome-boxes-nonfree-0.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
16:28 <@teuf> zeenix: shouldn't this be a noarch package ? 16:28 <@teuf> there is nothing architecture specific in there, is there? 16:29 <@zeenix> nope 16:29 * zeenix updates 16:30 <@teuf> Unlike rest ... -> Unlike the rest ... ? 16:30 <@teuf> pacakge 16:31 <@teuf> existence 16:32 <@teuf> update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : 16:32 <@teuf> update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : 16:32 <@teuf> is that installing mime/desktop files ? 16:33 <@teuf> I'd put http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2012-February/011360.html in the .spec "This package contains the nonfree data for Boxes" -> non-free to ship them in ... For more details on the rationale for the existence of this package: you can remove the empty %post sections I'm not sure about the Requires: gnome-boxes
(In reply to comment #4) > > "This package contains the nonfree data for Boxes" -> non-free > to ship them in ... > For more details on the rationale for the existence of this package: Sorry, didn't catch this bit. > I'm not sure about the Requires: gnome-boxes Just another step to try to ensure that these logos are not used outside Boxes.
Updated the the spec/srpm files at the same location according to latest review.
Not needed anymore. For details: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682573