RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 845269 - [lvmetad] Clients segfaulting on incorrect repsone from lvmetad
Summary: [lvmetad] Clients segfaulting on incorrect repsone from lvmetad
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: lvm2
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Petr Rockai
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 845259
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-02 14:04 UTC by Marian Csontos
Modified: 2013-02-21 08:13 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.02.98-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When an LVM command encountered a problem talking to lvmetad, the command could crash in certain circumstances. This problem has been fixed.
Clone Of: 845259
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:13:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
full gbd backtrace (6.38 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-02 14:06 UTC, Marian Csontos
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0501 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE lvm2 bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 21:30:45 UTC

Description Marian Csontos 2012-08-02 14:04:00 UTC
Description of problem:
Incorrect response from lvmetad is not handled correctly and causes segfault.
Parsing procedure returns NULL pointer which is dereferenced later:

<pre>
    static inline const char *daemon_reply_str(daemon_reply r, const char *path, const      ...|char *def) {
            return dm_config_find_str(r.cft->root, path, def);                              
    }
</pre>

Here the r.cft is 0x0

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lvm2-2.02.97-0.151

How reproducible:
low reproducibility of original lvmetad bug.
but this would crash 100% of time when wrong data are received.

Steps to Reproduce:
Bug 845259 in lvmetad would crash client.
  
Actual results:
segfault

Expected results:
error message or retry?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Marian Csontos 2012-08-02 14:06:21 UTC
Created attachment 601956 [details]
full gbd backtrace

Comment 3 Petr Rockai 2012-09-26 19:11:34 UTC
This should be fixed upstream now.

Comment 7 Corey Marthaler 2013-01-24 21:21:24 UTC
Have not seen any segfaults during the latest LVM regression testing while running with lvmetad turned on. Marking this verified (SanityOnly).

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:13:12 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0501.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.