RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 846788 - [RFE] Support for virt-who polling against RHEVM directly
Summary: [RFE] Support for virt-who polling against RHEVM directly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virt-who
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Radek Novacek
QA Contact: Entitlement Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 771481
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-08 17:27 UTC by Bryan Kearney
Modified: 2016-12-01 00:30 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: virt-who-0.8-1.el6
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:50:44 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0374 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virt-who bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:52:26 UTC

Description Bryan Kearney 2012-08-08 17:27:26 UTC 
For proper support for RHEVM, virt-who should poll RHEVM in the same way that it polls ESX. This is a request to suppor this feature.
Comment 2 Hui Wang 2012-09-13 05:03:17 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> For proper support for RHEVM, virt-who should poll RHEVM in the same way
> that it polls ESX. This is a request to suppor this feature.

Hi Bryan,

Who is the feature owner? I want to communicate with him/her to write the test scenarios.

Thanks very much :)

Regards,
Hui Wang
Comment 3 Hui Wang 2012-09-13 06:04:15 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > For proper support for RHEVM, virt-who should poll RHEVM in the same way
> > that it polls ESX. This is a request to suppor this feature.
> 
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> Who is the feature owner? I want to communicate with him/her to write the
> test scenarios.
> 
> Thanks very much :)
> 
> Regards,
> Hui Wang

<wanghui> rnovacek, bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846788 , are you the owner?
<rnovacek> wanghui: for the bug, yes
<wanghui> rnovacek, Did you have some reference for the feature or some comments for that. I am researching that for next testing.
<rnovacek> wanghui: I haven't got to the implementation yet, so nothing for now

I will document the scenarios after it finished ASAP.

Thanks Radek and Bryan.
Comment 4 Radek Novacek 2012-09-26 07:36:29 UTC 
This feature is present in virt-who-0.8-1.el6.
Comment 6 Hui Wang 2013-01-24 01:36:03 UTC 
Verified the issue. Now the virt-who can poll against RHEVM directly.
Version: virt-who-0.8-5.el6.
Move the status to verified.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:50:44 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0374.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.