Bug 846817 – FutureFeature: Provide Active directory integration to RHS-C

Bug 846817 - FutureFeature: Provide Active directory integration to RHS-C

Summary:	FutureFeature: Provide Active directory integration to RHS-C

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	rhsc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Shireesh
QA Contact:	Sudhir D
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	FutureFeature

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-08-08 15:33 EDT by Paul Cuzner
Modified:	2013-07-28 19:18 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-09-27 03:38:14 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Paul Cuzner 2012-08-08 15:33:32 EDT

Description of problem:
RHS-C support for domain based authentication is limited to IPA. Customers are frequently asking for MS Active Directory integration. This BZ requests that this capability is added the the RHS-C roadmap.

In addition to integration for authentication purposes, customers are also asking for AD group membership or OU to be used to determine the users permission within RHS-C.

Therefore integration for authentication and authorisation with AD would be the goal.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Shireesh 2012-09-27 03:38:14 EDT

This feature already exists in the product (inherited from RHEV-M). It needs to be added to documentation. Have raised a documentation bug for the same. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860947

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.