Bug 847725 – Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Bug 847725 - Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Summary:	Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 844165

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-08-13 07:16 EDT by Dan Mashal
Modified:	2012-08-18 23:22 EDT (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-08-13 08:12:36 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 07:16:00 EDT

Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-window-manager.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-window-manager-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: MATE Desktop window manager

Comment 1 Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 07:18:20 EDT

*** Bug 844165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 leigh scott 2012-08-13 08:12:36 EDT

Sorry you can't close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 as it pre-dates your bug.

Comment 3 leigh scott 2012-08-13 08:14:40 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 844165 ***

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2012-08-13 08:37:30 EDT

depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this.  If it hadn't been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted previously.  (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain why it wasn't noticed)

Comment 5 leigh scott 2012-08-13 08:48:18 EDT

(In reply to comment #4)
> depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this.  If it hadn't
> been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted
> previously.  (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain
> why it wasn't noticed)

Wolfgang had no knowledge of this till Dan closed his assigned rewiew.

Comment 6 Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 08:56:11 EDT

Yeah well, that's what happens when your co-maintainer is 8 or 9 hours ahead of you bruv. Can't stay in sync 24/7.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.