847725 – Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Bug 847725 - Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Summary: Review Request: mate-window-manager - MATE Desktop window manager

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 844165
Alias:	None
Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review
Sub Component:	(Show other bugs)
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Priority:	unspecified
Severity:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2012-08-13 11:16 UTC by Dan Mashal
Modified:	2012-08-19 03:22 UTC (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-08-13 12:12:36 UTC
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---
Dependent Products:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 11:16:00 UTC

Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-window-manager.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-window-manager-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: MATE Desktop window manager

Comment 1 Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 11:18:20 UTC

*** Bug 844165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 leigh scott 2012-08-13 12:12:36 UTC

Sorry you can't close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 as it pre-dates your bug.

Comment 3 leigh scott 2012-08-13 12:14:40 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 844165 ***

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2012-08-13 12:37:30 UTC

depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this.  If it hadn't been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted previously.  (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain why it wasn't noticed)

Comment 5 leigh scott 2012-08-13 12:48:18 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> depends... if that's what they agreed on how to handle this.  If it hadn't
> been discussed previously, then yeah, may as well go with the one submitted
> previously.  (I added the other one to the MATE tracker, which may explain
> why it wasn't noticed)

Wolfgang had no knowledge of this till Dan closed his assigned rewiew.

Comment 6 Dan Mashal 2012-08-13 12:56:11 UTC

Yeah well, that's what happens when your co-maintainer is 8 or 9 hours ahead of you bruv. Can't stay in sync 24/7.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.