Hide Forgot
I'm trying to write code with SSSDConfig to add several options to my sssd.conf: ldap_autofs_map_object_class = nisMap ldap_autofs_map_name = nisMapName ldap_autofs_entry_object_class = nisObject ldap_autofs_entry_key = cn ldap_autofs_entry_value = nisMapEntry Unfortunately the following code snippet fails: #!/usr/bin/python from SSSDConfig import SSSDConfig a=SSSDConfig() a.import_config('/tmp/sssd.conf') a.activate_service('autofs') b=a.get_domain('default') b.add_provider('ldap', 'autofs') b.set_option('ldap_autofs_map_object_class', 'nisMap') with: SSSDConfig.NoOptionError: Section [default] has no option [ldap_autofs_map_object_class] It appears that /usr/share/sssd/sssd.api.d/sssd-ldap.conf has a section for "[provider/ldap/autofs]" but it contains no items at all.
Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1478
I should note that I'm doing this in F17.
Fixed in beta7 that hit rawhide yesterday is is going to be released f18 updates-testing soon. Closing. Jason, thank you for reporting the bug. If you'd like to have this fix released for F-17, then holler and I'll build an updated package for you.
I've long since rolled out an updated package with the upstream patch included. I guess my only concern is whether any future F17 update would show up without that patch included, but I think I'd notice that pretty quickly and re-patch.
I've made a local commit (not pushed) in the f17 branch of the SSSD fedora package -- that should prevent me from issuing an update without the patch :-) I also plan to eventually backport SSSD 1.9 to F-17 when it bakes in F-18.
Just a note that the 1.8.5 update that was pushed to F17 did not have this fix, so I had to re-patch. Looking forward to 1.9.0 so I'll not have to worry about this again.
sssd-1.8.5-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.8.5-3.fc17
Sorry about that, I'm not sure where did the patch go.. I've built an F-17 update and put it through Bodhi.
This appears to have come back at some point; the same code as in the initial comment fails in the same way with sssd-1.8.6-1.fc17.x86_64. It's been a while since I installed a fresh F17 machine, but I'll dig up the patch and build a fixed package locally.
(In reply to comment #9) > This appears to have come back at some point; the same code as in the > initial comment fails in the same way with sssd-1.8.6-1.fc17.x86_64. It's > been a while since I installed a fresh F17 machine, but I'll dig up the > patch and build a fixed package locally. Can you try if 1.9 from updates-testing works for you? If so, I would push that update to stable, it contains the fix.
Yes, it does work fine. I gave karma to the update.
Fixed by an update.