RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 848155 - package net-snmp-5.5-41.el6_3.1.x86_64 always fail to read these three values of UCD-DISKIO-MIB, diskIOLA1, diskIOLA5, diskIOLA15
Summary: package net-snmp-5.5-41.el6_3.1.x86_64 always fail to read these three values...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: net-snmp
Version: 6.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Safranek
QA Contact: Dalibor Pospíšil
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-14 18:51 UTC by Christoph Galuschka
Modified: 2018-11-30 20:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: net-snmp-5.5-44.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, values of UCD-DISKIO-MIB::diskIOLA1, diskIOLA5 and diskIOLA15 objects were not implemented on Linux operating system. With this update, these objects are implemented and their values will be shown in UCD-DISKIO-MIB::diskIOTable.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:27:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0421 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE net-snmp bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:49:35 UTC

Description Christoph Galuschka 2012-08-14 18:51:28 UTC 
Description of problem:
Here is the output of snmptable, notice it display all question marks under the diskIOLA1/diskIOLA5/diskIOLA15 column:

# snmptable -v 2c -c public 127.0.0.1 diskIOTable

SNMP table: UCD-DISKIO-MIB::diskIOTable

 diskIOIndex diskIODevice diskIONRead diskIONWritten diskIOReads diskIOWrites diskIOLA1 diskIOLA5 diskIOLA15 diskIONReadX diskIONWrittenX
           1 ram0 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           2 ram1 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           3 ram2 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           4 ram3 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           5 ram4 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           6 ram5 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           7 ram6 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           8 ram7 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
           9 ram8 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          10 ram9 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          11 ram10 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          12 ram11 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          13 ram12 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          14 ram13 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          15 ram14 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          16 ram15 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          17 loop0 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          18 loop1 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          19 loop2 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          20 loop3 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          21 loop4 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          22 loop5 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          23 loop6 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          24 loop7 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          25 sr0 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0
          26 sda 2210736128 263530496 3414176 195768919 ? ? ? 15095638016 1318818490368
          27 sda1 2273280 18432 604 10 ? ? ? 2273280 18432
          28 sda2 2207827968 263512064 3413417 195768909 ? ? ? 15092729856 1318818471936
          29 dm-0 2195543040 170389504 3447900 321954431 ? ? ? 15080444928 1318725349376
          30 dm-1 11272192 93110272 2752 22732 ? ? ? 11272192 93110272
          31 dm-2 570368 12288 140 3 ? ? ? 570368 12288

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-libs-5.5-41.el6_3.1.x86_64
net-snmp-utils-5.5-41.el6_3.1.x86_64
net-snmp-5.5-41.el6_3.1.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install net-snmp incl. dependencies
2. start snmpd and query "snmptable -v 2c -c public 127.0.0.1 diskIOTable"
  
Actual results:
diskIOLA1 diskIOLA5 diskIOLA15 only shows ?

Expected results:
diskIOLA1 diskIOLA5 diskIOLA15 should show a number

Additional info:
Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2012-08-29 13:13:58 UTC 
This has already been fixed upstream in SVN rev. 19233.
Comment 3 Christoph Galuschka 2012-08-29 18:25:27 UTC 
Jan, thanks for the information.
Will the fix make it to the snmp-package used in RHEL6?
Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2012-09-10 08:39:33 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.
Comment 6 Christoph Galuschka 2012-09-14 14:58:46 UTC 
So there will be a fix for this in an upcoming update?
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:27:33 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0421.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.