Latest upstream release: 1.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.0 URL: http://mupdf.com/download/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Would it be possible to update this package to the latest stable release? Many thanks for your help, Pablo
Latest upstream release: 1.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.1 URL: http://mupdf.com/download/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 1.3rc1 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.1-3.fc19 URL: http://mupdf.com/download/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Latest upstream release: 1.3 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.1-4.fc20 URL: http://mupdf.com/download/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
This would be helpful. There are MANY enhancements in v1.3 vs the currently available v1.1...
Orphaned package?
Sorry, I don’t know whether the package is orphaned (according to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/landgraf?acls=owner, it shouldn’t be) It might be that the address used to contact Pavel Zhukov is obsolete. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Landgraf, there is another one. I’ve tried to add it to the CC-list of this bug, but it doesn’t work (or at least I don’t have the required permissions to do it). I don’t have a FAS account. Could anyone be so kind to write a comment in his wiki page mentioning this issue? Many thanks for your help, Pablo
The package is not orphaned. Which address do you mean? The @fedoraproject.org address is usually aliased to the address used in this bug report. The @jabber.ru information is not an email address. The policy to handle this case is this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I will bring this up on the devel list.
(In reply to Till Maas from comment #8) > The package is not orphaned. Which address do you mean? The > @fedoraproject.org address is usually aliased to the address used in this > bug report. The @jabber.ru information is not an email address. The policy > to handle this case is this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I will bring this up on the devel list. The package is not orphaned. It looks like upstream monitoring did not open new bug while old one is here. @fedoraproject.org address is active and has updated aliases. Thank you for the ping and I'm sorry about that.
mupdf-1.3 brings bundled libraries [1]. They can be easy removed but openjpeg > 2 is not packaged for fedora yet. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
Closed because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848904#c10
Pavel, according to #1084021 openjpeg2 has been already submitted as an update for Fedora 20.