Description of problem:
On a system build with standard RH7.3 then with the kernel upgraded to 2.4.18-
24.7.x, certain Intel Pro 100 NICs are no longer correctly identified.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
(Requires an Intel Pro/100 NIC verdorid:8086, deviceid:1229, subvendorid:8086,
subdeviceid:0040 or 1015)
1. Install normal RH7.3 with only "Anonymous FTP" and "Web Server" packages.
2. Execute /usr/sbin/kudzu -p
3. Page-up to see the correctly identified Intel Pro 100 NIC.
4. Copy "kernel-2.4.18-24.7.x.i686.rpm" and "modutils-2.4.18-3.7x.i386.rpm" to
the local disk.
5. Execute rpm -Fvh kernel-2.4.18-24.7.x.i686.rpm modutils-2.4.18-3.7x.i386.rpm
7. Execute /usr/sbin/kudzu -p
8. Page-up to see the previously identified Intel Pro 100 NIC is no longer
System no longer correctly identifies Intel Pro 100 NIC with the following
device and vendor IDs:
deviceid:1229 subdeviceid:0040 or 1015
Intel Pro 100 NICs would continue to be correctly identified.
Diagnosis performed on COMPAQ Deskpro, CPQ Number: 368961-001
A system built with RH7.3 which has had ONLY its modutils upgraded to "modutils-
2.4.18-3.7x.i386.rpm" does NOT exhibit the problem.
what exact kernel was the last known good ?
The last known good kernel was 2.4.18-4.
This is the kernel included with my RedHat 7.3 distribution. Although I can no
longer test it, I am sure that things were working well as recent as kernel
8086:1229 is the most common PRO/100 ven:device ID pair out there, so
it's unlikely this is caused by a missing entry in the driver's
device table, be it with eepro100 or e100.
Is this caused by eepro100 being replaced by e100 in the newer
kernel? Maybe /etc/modules.conf needs to be updated to replace the
old eepro100 alias with e100?
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases,
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/