RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 850757 - When flushing, discard only memb_join messages
Summary: When flushing, discard only memb_join messages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: corosync
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Friesse
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-22 11:05 UTC by Jan Friesse
Modified: 2018-11-29 19:42 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: corosync-1.4.1-11.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause Using rrp in some networks Consequence Some networks / CPU timing is causing very often marking ring as faulty in situations when it's not. Main problem seems to be that Corosync drops memb_join packets, but also ORF tokens Fix Drop only memb_join messages Result RRP interface should no longer be marked improperly as faulty.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 07:50:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed patch (3.01 KB, patch)
2012-08-22 11:05 UTC, Jan Friesse
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 400723 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0497 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE corosync bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 21:18:24 UTC

Description Jan Friesse 2012-08-22 11:05:20 UTC
Created attachment 606196 [details]
Proposed patch

Description of problem:

When flushing, discard only memb_join messages

    Patch solves problem when 1 ring out of 2 went up/down quite often.

    The simplest setup to reproduce bug is following:
    - 2 VMs, connected by 2 network interfaces
    - OS: Linux
    - On one of the VMs, a test program sending some CPG messages (see the
      script "test_corosync.sh" joined to this mail for example)

    Here are the Corosync logs we get when we do this setup:

    Jun 06 16:23:40 corosync [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left the
    membership and a new membership was formed.
    Jun 06 16:23:40 corosync [CPG   ] chosen downlist: sender r(0)
    ip(192.168.56.104) r(1) ip(192.168.57.104) ; members(old:1 left:0)
    Jun 06 16:23:40 corosync [MAIN  ] Completed service synchronization,
    ready to provide service.
    Jun 06 16:24:37 corosync [TOTEM ] Marking ringid 1 interface
    192.168.57.105 FAULTY
    Jun 06 16:24:38 corosync [TOTEM ] Automatically recovered ring 1
    Jun 06 16:25:33 corosync [TOTEM ] Marking ringid 1 interface
    192.168.57.105 FAULTY
    Jun 06 16:25:34 corosync [TOTEM ] Automatically recovered ring 1
    Jun 06 16:26:35 corosync [TOTEM ] Marking ringid 1 interface
    192.168.57.105 FAULTY
    Jun 06 16:26:36 corosync [TOTEM ] Automatically recovered ring 1
    (...)

    The second ring goes down about every 2 minutes and automatically back
    up right after.

    We spent some times looking for the commit that introduced this bug, and
    it appears it's due the following one:
    Corosync 1.3.3 -> 1.3.4: e27a58d93d0d3795beb550f87b660c9c04f11386
    Corosync 1.4.1 -> 1.4.2: be608c050247e5f9c8266b8a0f9803cc0a3dc881
    Commit message: Ignore memb_join messages during flush operations

    I had a look at this commit, and it seems to me it's dropping too many
    packets:
    Because of this commit, while totemrrp_recv_flush() is called, Corosync
    drops memb_join packets, but also ORF tokens. In the end, it seems that
    sometimes, we drop so many of them that Corosync marks the ring as
    faulty.

    To fix that, only memb_join messages are dropped now.


How reproducible:
0.1%

Steps to Reproduce:
Described in description
  
Actual results:
Marking rrp interface as faulty too often

Expected results:
Oposite of actual results

Additional info:
For QE: Community patch, I was not able to reproduce it by myself.

Comment 2 Jan Friesse 2012-08-23 08:17:05 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Cause
Using rrp in some networks

Consequence
Some networks / CPU timing is causing very often marking ring as faulty in situations when it's not. Main problem seems to be that Corosync  drops memb_join packets, but also ORF tokens

Fix
Drop only memb_join messages

Result
RRP interface should no longer be marked improperly as faulty.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 07:50:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0497.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.