Bug 85200 - pstack fails for posix-threaded programs with only the main thread
pstack fails for posix-threaded programs with only the main thread
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: pstack (Show other bugs)
8.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Roland McGrath
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-02-26 11:45 EST by David Juran
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:51 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-12-04 05:22:13 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
testcase (29 bytes, text/plain)
2003-02-26 11:46 EST, David Juran
no flags Details
and this remedies the problem (604 bytes, patch)
2003-02-26 12:02 EST, David Juran
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description David Juran 2003-02-26 11:45:29 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202

Description of problem:
pstack doesn't work for a program that only has one single thread, but is
compiled with the option -pthread.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.gcc -o test -pthread test.c
2. ./test
3.now attach to test with pstack and note that you don't get any output.
    

Actual Results:  32736: ./test

Expected Results:  32736: ./test
0x08048304: main + 0x10 (1, bffff0c4, bffff0cc, 400124b8, 1, 8048244)
0x420158d4: __libc_start_main + 0xa4 (80482f4, 1, bffff0c4, 804820c, 804832c,
4000a950) + 40000f48


Additional info:
Comment 1 David Juran 2003-02-26 11:46:15 EST
Created attachment 90380 [details]
testcase
Comment 2 David Juran 2003-02-26 12:02:34 EST
Created attachment 90382 [details]
and this remedies the problem
Comment 3 Roland McGrath 2003-11-11 20:40:16 EST
I've implemented a different fix.  Thanks for the report.
Comment 4 David Juran 2003-12-04 05:22:13 EST
Seems to work fine (-:
Comment 5 John Flanagan 2003-12-19 09:41:42 EST
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2003-250.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.