Bug 853387 - Java SIGSEGV: org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement()
Summary: Java SIGSEGV: org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: 5.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Deepak Bhole
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-31 10:51 UTC by Jan Hutař
Modified: 2013-03-13 14:19 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-13 14:19:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
/tmp/hs_err_pid20642.log - generated error report (38.44 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-31 10:51 UTC, Jan Hutař 		no flags Details
View All

Description Jan Hutař 2012-08-31 10:51:59 UTC 
Created attachment 608478 [details]
/tmp/hs_err_pid20642.log - generated error report

Description of problem:
While installing latest Spacewalk nightly compose I have noticed Java SIGSEGV error in the catalina.out log (and Tomcat not starting).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.24.1.10.4.el5
tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.22.el5_7


How reproducible:
seen this for the first time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to install Spacewalk nightly - last phase of installation is restarting all relevant services - and Tomcat did not came up


Actual results:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb51c4dfc, pid=20642, tid=2517949328
#
# JRE version: 6.0_22-b22
# Java VM: OpenJDK Server VM (20.0-b11 mixed mode linux-x86 )
# Derivative: IcedTea6 1.10.4
# Distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.8 Beta (Tikanga), package rhel-1.24.1.10.4.el5-i386
# Problematic frame:
# J  org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement()Z
#


Expected results:
Should work
Comment 2 Deepak Bhole 2012-09-10 19:48:45 UTC 
Are you seeing this consistently?
Comment 3 Deepak Bhole 2013-03-13 14:19:55 UTC 
Closing due to lack of further updates and as RHEL-5 is now in phase 2.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.