Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Common components for Moksha Fedora Account System Username: ralph rpmlint output: python-moksha-common.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary moksha 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji - f17 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4456765 There already exists a package moksha (version 0.8.8 in rawhide). I've done work upstream to split it into three different namespace packages to lighten the dependency load on some machines.
Quick second release: disable tests since they are failing in koji. It's something odd with the version of python-mock. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common-1.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
I'll review this soon.
Quick third release changing license to the more correct "ASL 2.0 or MIT": Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common-1.0.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
Still another: Use %{optflags}: Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-moksha-common-1.0.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (ASL 2.0 or MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. See below - Package has a correct %clean section. See below - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. This spec is not allowed for el5 as it misses the buildroot and %clean sections. 2. rpmlint says: python-moksha-common.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary moksha 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I see no blockers anymore, so this package is APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-moksha-common Short Description: Common components for Moksha Owners: ralph lmacken Branches: f16 f17 f18 el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Bodhi updates -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-moksha-common