Additional info: libreport version: 2.0.13 kernel: 3.5.3-1.fc17.x86_64 description: :SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer from 'name_connect' accesses on the tcp_socket . : :***** Plugin connect_ports (99.5 confidence) suggests ********************** : :If you want to allow /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer to connect to network port 81 :Then you need to modify the port type. :Do :# semanage port -a -t PORT_TYPE -p tcp 81 : where PORT_TYPE is one of the following: mmcc_port_t, dns_port_t, asterisk_port_t, ipp_port_t, couchdb_port_t, streaming_port_t, port_t, vnc_port_t, gatekeeper_port_t, ephemeral_port_type, ftp_port_t, speech_port_t, http_cache_port_t, dns_port_t, http_port_t, squid_port_t, ircd_port_t, pulseaudio_port_t, flash_port_t, unreserved_port_t, jabber_client_port_t, monopd_port_t, soundd_port_t, ocsp_port_t, kerberos_port_t. : :***** Plugin catchall (1.49 confidence) suggests *************************** : :If you believe that totem-plugin-viewer should be allowed name_connect access on the tcp_socket by default. :Then you should report this as a bug. :You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. :Do :allow this access for now by executing: :# grep totem-plugin-vi /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol :# semodule -i mypol.pp : :Additional Information: :Source Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:mozilla_plugin_t:s0-s0:c : 0.c1023 :Target Context system_u:object_r:reserved_port_t:s0 :Target Objects [ tcp_socket ] :Source totem-plugin-vi :Source Path /usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer :Port 81 :Host (removed) :Source RPM Packages totem-mozplugin-3.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64 :Target RPM Packages :Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.10.0-146.fc17.noarch :Selinux Enabled True :Policy Type targeted :Enforcing Mode Enforcing :Host Name (removed) :Platform Linux (removed) 3.5.3-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug : 29 18:46:34 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 :Alert Count 2 :First Seen 2012-09-07 09:55:20 CEST :Last Seen 2012-09-07 09:55:20 CEST :Local ID 18fa0c4d-f218-4316-8518-c602351709d5 : :Raw Audit Messages :type=AVC msg=audit(1347004520.936:67): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=3258 comm="task1" dest=81 scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:mozilla_plugin_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:reserved_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket : : :type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1347004520.936:67): arch=x86_64 syscall=connect success=no exit=EACCES a0=13 a1=7faadc00a9f0 a2=10 a3=40 items=0 ppid=1 pid=3258 auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 euid=1000 suid=1000 fsuid=1000 egid=1000 sgid=1000 fsgid=1000 tty=(none) ses=2 comm=task1 exe=/usr/libexec/totem-plugin-viewer subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:mozilla_plugin_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) : :Hash: totem-plugin-vi,mozilla_plugin_t,reserved_port_t,tcp_socket,name_connect : :audit2allow : :#============= mozilla_plugin_t ============== :#!!!! This avc can be allowed using the boolean 'allow_ypbind' : :allow mozilla_plugin_t reserved_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect; : :audit2allow -R : :#============= mozilla_plugin_t ============== :#!!!! This avc can be allowed using the boolean 'allow_ypbind' : :allow mozilla_plugin_t reserved_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect; :
Created attachment 610649 [details] File: type
Created attachment 610650 [details] File: hashmarkername
I wonder if we should just label port 81 as an apache port, since it seems to happen quite often.
I added it to F18 for testing. You can test it for now using # semanage port -a -t http_port_t -p tcp 81 on F17.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 17 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 17. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '17'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 17 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 17 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-07-30. Fedora 17 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.