Bug 85564 - Unrelevant info for desktops/workstations displayed during startup
Unrelevant info for desktops/workstations displayed during startup
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: initscripts (Show other bugs)
phoebe
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-03-04 09:31 EST by Mikael Carneholm
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:34 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-04 10:47:40 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
A quick draft to illustrate what it _could_ look like (7.94 KB, image/png)
2003-03-05 18:00 EST, Mikael Carneholm
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Mikael Carneholm 2003-03-04 09:31:31 EST
Description of problem:
If you chose to install a desktop (or workstation), I don't see why I (as a
desktop user) need to know that smbd or postgres or httpd or ... is starting.
This is relevant only for servers installations, and should thus only be
displayed (by default) for servers. Summary: only display boot messages if it is
turned on (and it should only be turned on by default for server installs), and
you should have to explicitly turn it on for desktops/workstations to see it.

How reproducible:
Always.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot/reboot the machine
2. Watch the messages
3. Realise that this info is not something a desktop user should see
    
Actual results:
A lot of boot messages

Expected results:
A slick (black) "Red Hat Linux" screen with shadowman logo and possibly some
sort of progress bar displayed during boot.

Additional info:
If Linux shall succeed on the desktop (as well as on servers), it has to adapt
itself better to the different types of usage scenarios.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-03-04 10:47:40 EST
We may look into this at some point in the future. But not right now.
Comment 2 Mikael Carneholm 2003-03-05 18:00:00 EST
Created attachment 90485 [details]
A quick draft to illustrate what it _could_ look like

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.